[C-prog-lang-l] phase 1 testing

[Jan Pechanec]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Tomáš Sláma wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've been working on my implementation of GNU TAR and got to a point 
> where some of the test are still failing but they (in my opinion) 
> shouldn't be.

Hi,

I have two questions.  First, do you have the latest reversion of the 
tests (c-prog-lang repo)? And the other one - do you see the same 
errors when you use GNU tar as the implementation?  If not, please see 
README on how to do it.

If all tests pass with GNU tar then you will need to fix your 
implementation.  Let us know if that's not the case.

Thanks, Jan.

 >
> Here's the condensed diff of those (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) that failed:
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> 002
> ---
>  aaa-file
>  another-file2
>  empty.data
> -file.zero
>  file1.random
>  file2.zero
>  file3.zero
> +file.zero
>  hello-world
>  small-file
> ---
>
> 003
> ---
>  aaa-file
>  empty.data
> -file3.zero
> +file.zero
>  small-file
> ---
>
> 004
> ---
>  aaa-file
>  empty.data
> -file3.zero
> +file.zero
>  small-file
> ---
>
> 005
> ---
>  aaa-file
>  empty.data
> -file3.zero
> +file.zero
>  small-file
>  mytar: nonexistent1: Not found in archive
>  mytar: nonexistent2: Not found in archive
> ---
>
> 006
> ---
>  aaa-file
>  empty.data
> -file3.zero
> +file.zero
>  small-file
>  mytar: nonexistent1: Not found in archive
>  mytar: nonexistent2: Not found in archive
> ---
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> I tried printing the bash variables from test-00x.sh variables and it 
> seems that they don't match the test-output-00x.txt files. Am I missing 
> something?
>
> Thanks (and sorry, if it's just me being confused :) )!
>
> T. Sláma
> _______________________________________________
> c-prog-lang-l mailing list
> c-prog-lang-l at mff.cuni.cz
> http://mbox.ms.mff.cuni.cz/listserv/listinfo/c-prog-lang-l
>

-- 
Jan Pechanec <jp (at) devnull (dot) cz>
http://www.devnull.cz